Net metering needs to be preserved
I am writing in response to the article, "Solar Without Subsidy" from Jan. 18. It is important to note that, despite assertions by utility industry spokespeople that solar is doing just fine, in fact the current net metering caps and uncertainty in the creation of solar power are actually slowing down potential installations
The numbers and size of projects would be even higher if the Massachusetts Senate version of current solar bills were to prevail in ongoing negotiations. I know this because my organization has built several solar projects and has been working to help build solar projects that directly benefit low-income people in Central Massachusetts. Some projects have stalled, and the size and impact of other projects have shrunk because of the net metering caps.
Many residents here in Central Massachusetts cities and towns would like to see the net metering caps eliminated altogether and the retail rate for net metering (higher than the wholesale rate) preserved. This would allow more solar projects to be built that would benefit the majority of ratepayers in Central Massachusetts – homeowners without solar-compatible rooftops, renters and low-to-moderate income residents.
Additionally, as a dad and parent in Central Massachusetts, I have a vested interest in ensuring that we mitigate the terrible anticipated effects of climate change. I believe the dad mandate outweighs utility industry concerns over market share and competition. The moral imperative for an even greater expansion of solar rests on our shoulders at this crucial juncture. I hope that common sense prevails in the debate and that we continue to build a public infrastructure for clean energy by expanding our shared solar opportunities in the commonwealth.
Dave McMahon is the co-executive director at Dismas House of Massachusetts, Inc. in Worcester.
WBJ Web Partners
Most Recent
Most Recent
0 Comments