Order a PDF Printer Friendly Email This
01/04/10
When two PowerPoint wielding developers from Colorado and Las Vegas came to a Milford Board of Selectmen meeting in October to pitch the idea of Crossroads, a resort-style casino in town, state Rep. John Fernandes, D-Milford, said they were not shunned out the door.
“We welcomed them and listened to their ideas,” Fernandes said.
But, that doesn’t mean townspeople don’t have some serious questions about a casino, hotel and spa being built in their backyards.
While sitting listening to the developers a host of questions ran through Fernandes’ mind, including what the impact of such a development would be on traffic, water and sewer connections, police and fire coverage.
And one other thing: The state legislature hasn’t even approved allowing casinos in the state. In fact, last year lawmakers shot it down.
Nonetheless, developers are staking out their ground in Central Massachusetts in case expanded gaming is approved in the state in 2010.
David Nunes is a real estate developer and president and founder of Ajax Gaming Ventures in Colorado, which previously teamed up with a company tied to Donald Trump to lobby for a casino in Rhode Island. That bid was unsuccessful. Nunes said he has strong ties to New England and has been thinking about expanded gaming in the commonwealth for a decade. He also said Milford’s position near the intersection of the Massachusetts Turnpike and Interstate 495 makes it an ideal spot for Crossroads, his idea of a resort-style casino.
Nunes has partnered with Bill Warner, a former COO of Station Casinos, a Las Vegas gaming company. The developers have a conceptual plan for an $850 million, more than 200-acre casino, complete with 3,000 slot machines and 100 table games.
“While the state is working on the legislation, we’re working on…a development team, putting a contractor in place and getting a gaming flag so when that legislation does come out we’re ready and capable of building,” he said.
Meanwhile, Penn National Gaming, a gaming company from Pennsylvania, has been in touch with some Central Massachusetts officials about a possible casino in the Blackstone Valley. Officials from Penn National Gaming did not return calls from the Worcester Business Journal for this story.
Still, no casinos or any expanded gaming will be allowed in the state without approval from the state legislature.
One area politician that could have a strong say in what happens on Beacon Hill with casino legislation is Karen Spilka, a democratic state senator from Ashland. She chairs the legislature’s economic development committee, which in October held a full day of hearings on expanded gaming.
Legislation on gaming will have to pass through her committee.
But Spilka said she would like to see some more work done before the issue is even considered.
“I think clearly different casino interests are trying to stake out different geographic locations. They want to be somewhat on the ready,” Spilka said. “But at this point, I would have some concerns about transportation access, environmental issues, just what would be involved in building a casino. So much needs to be figured out before any decisions can be made.”
For example, last year the state hired a New Jersey research company, Spectrum Gaming, to study what the impact of having gaming in the state would be.
The group estimated that significant revenue and jobs could be generated if three resort-style casinos were built in the state. That included $1.5 billion in gross gaming revenue, more than 4,000 direct jobs at each casino, and an overall impact of 20,000 direct and indirect jobs statewide.
But the economy has changed drastically since then, Spilka argues, and she said the first step toward any passage of expanded gaming is a new study showing the impacts.
Until new information is available, Spilka said she’s neutral on the issue.
Another important factor will be to get approval from the municipalities that would be impacted by a casino. Not just the host community, but surrounding communities as well.
Crossroads’ conceptual plans call for it to sit just north of Interstate 495, within a few miles of the town of Holliston.
“I think the (immediate) reaction was, what about the traffic?” said Paul LeBeau, Holliston’s town administrator. “The scale of the project suggests it could have a significant impact on the surrounding neighborhoods.”
While legislation proposed by Gov. Deval Patrick last year to allow casinos created a trust fund that would help host communities mitigate incurred expenses due to a casino, there were no such protections for surrounding communities.
LeBeau said he’s not against casinos, he just said it’s premature to really think about it.
Some state residents seem philosophically opposed to casinos, however.
Kathleen Conley Norbut is the president of United to Stop Slots, a Massachusetts group studying the impact casinos could have on local communities.
She’s put together a list of 27 factors that should be considered before gaming is allowed. The environment, traffic and water infrastructure systems will not be the only things impacted, according to that list. The schools will need to be updated for new children of workers that will be in the area, and lottery money, which is given back to cities and towns in unrestricted aid, will decline, she argues.
Not to mention what she calls the “human impact” of gambling addiction.
“What we’re really asking is for (legislators) to do their due diligence and make an impartial, informed decision on the costs and the benefits, and weigh those against the human impacts,” she said.
Some say casinos coming to the state could actually help, not hurt, businesses.
Thomas Sherridan is president of the Chamber of Commerce of Eastern Connecticut, whose membership area includes Mohegan Sun and Foxwoods, two of New England’s largest resort-style casinos.
“Overall, the impact has been positive,” he said. “There’s been a significant growth in the business community. Just think about the amount of people they hold and room every night, and the amount of people that eat there or in the area. Goods and services businesses have done quite well.”
It’s not all good, however.
Two casinos within a few miles of each other has created inconvenient traffic issues for the towns, he said. He said it’s natural for businesses to be worried about new competition opening in the region.
But, he said, he believes the casinos have raised the quality of services delivered in the region.
For example, the casinos have some “top-shelf” restaurants.
In response, local restaurants have increased their quality to compete with the casinos. That makes a better product for customers.
Plus, he said, numerous fast food chains, hotels and motels have opened in the area and employees of the casino are now contributing tax dollars to the state.
The WBJ article downplays that Governor Patrick called on both House Speaker DeLeo and Senate President Therese Murray to join the growing list of leaders and organizations calling for a fresh, independent cost-benefit analysis of slots/slot casinos before considering legislation on this matter.
.
Although Speaker DeLeo may not want to commission an independent cost-benefit analysis that might reveal the net loss of slots/casinos any prudent legislator would know that it is necessary due to the economic decline, the lack of any data-based mitigation for impacted regions/social costs and the abysmal failure of the Governor's proposal to reflect realistic jobs/revenues and costs.
.
Here are some of the individuals and organizations that have called for a fresh independent cost-benefit analysis:
Governor Patrick
Governor Dukakis
Former AG Scott Harshbarger
Mass Chiefs of Police Association
League of Women Voters
Mass Council of Churches
Mass Family Institute
NASW-MA Chapter
USS Mass
Western MA Casino Task Force
among others.
.
Economic times have changed since Spectrum prepared a report for the Commonwealth.
.
Casinos, racinos and slot parlors around the country have defaulted, filed bankruptcy or re-structured.
.
Foxwoods has defaulted. Mohegan Sun cancelled an expansion project. Twin River is in bankruptcy.
.
Mr. Norton's company is in bankruptcy. What's the deal there?
.
What does this say about the phoney "Casino Capitalism" that got us into the global meltdown?
.
Something for nothing schemes didn't work before and they won't magically work now.
.
In June 2009, Spectrum prepared a report for the CT DOR that's posted on the United to Stop Slots in Massachusetts web site. It's worth the read for the analysis contained. It includes: Low wage jobs, unfunded criminal prosecutions, and local job 'cannibalization,' unfunded local impacts.
.
Those impacts are not a glitzy as the Casino Gold that's being promoted, but they're ones that every Massachusetts Taxpayer will be forced to absorb.
Mr. Norton:
It's always interesting to read your comments, but maybe a little disclosure would be helpful. This one also appears to be a cut and paste from your Boston Globe comments.
From Forbes:
H. STEVEN NORTON ...also currently serves as a Director of Centaur, Inc., a privately held company which ... owns Hossier Park, an Indiana race track, located in Anderson, Indiana....Mr. Norton is also a Director of ... North East Resorts, Inc., a privately held company pursuing gaming in the state of Massachusetts.
Mr. Norton:
Maybe you could comment on Centaur's finacial condition since some have interpreted it as an attempt to lower the tax rate on racinos in Indiana, essentially a state bailout.
"Anderson, Ind. — Hoosier Park Racing and Casino’s parent company, Centaur LLC, missed an interest payment to its senior lenders Tuesday, causing the company to default on one of its loans.
With the missed interest payment, however, two of Indianapolis-based Centaur’s affiliated entities in Pennsylvania, Valley View Downs LP and Centaur PA Land LP, filed voluntary Chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions. Brown said the bankruptcy filings were designed to help Centaur keep its gaming permit in Pennsylvania, with which it plans to build another racino called Valley View Downs & Casino.
“We have the last gaming license in Pennsylvania, and we are deeply committed to building that facility,” Brown said. “This was the best mechanism to preserve it.”
Since your company is privately held, for the sake of full disclosure, should one of the questions Massachusetts residents be asking is what statutory requirement the legislature should impose on the viability and solvency of licensees?
Brandon Butler's article today, on casino gaming, is very balanced, and if further study is needed, as Senator Karen Spilka has indicated, you have excellent help available from Spectrum Gaming, that could update their recent report and from U. Mass Professor Clyde Barrow, who has been following New England gaming for years.
A number of questions that could be raised or updated during such a study, and be available during the Legislative process, are included here:
What kind of casino tax rate, including community and county fees, will allow Massachusetts casinos to compete with Connecticut casinos?
What amenities are required or desirable to create casino resorts, that will bring visitors from surrounding States and foreign Countries?
Which casino locations provide inter state highway access, that will have the least traffic impact on host communities?
Which areas of the State need jobs, where the resident population lacks a formal college education, and their textile mills have closed?
What up front fees and development requirements are financially feasible, considering varying tax rates and locations in or near different sized population densities?
Which MA communities are interested in hosting a
casino in their city limits?
What kind of selection process for the casino sites and operators will allow for a quick transition, so the State can benefit from the construction, jobs and taxes? and temporary facilities(if allowed) could be operable within a year of selection of sites and operators.
Has an increase in crime been a reality in casino jurisdictions, when comparing the incidence of crime to the true population at risk; including non resident workers, local citizens and casino visitors?
How much spending can be expected by the casino operators to businesses in the casino resident city, county and in the State?
Will the casinos create a tremendous increase in population and school needs for new employees; or will the great majority of jobs go to area residents? The New Jersey Legislation required that all but supervisory casino positions be State residents, or more than 95% of the available positions.
What agency will handle the investigation of casino executives, casino employees and casino operators and suppliers? Hopefully the State will see the wisdom of only completing police checks on non gaming employees, banking institutions, insurance companies, travel agencies, and regional suppliers with casino company sales, (below a reasonable dollar threshold).
I'm sure there are many other questions that need to be considered, but these are a few that I would suggest to move the process quickly, answer questions that many MA citizens are concerned about, and
expand on the data that has already been thoroughly investigated by the State.
Steve Norton
Seantor Spilka must have had her head in the sand for the last 15-20 years. A new study? Of what? That instead of MA residents spending $1.1 billion each year at the CT casinos and RI slot parlors, they're spending $1 billion? Is she serious? This is the chair of the Senate's economic development committee? She wants to kick the can down the road another year? What is with these moral morons who try to dictate how I spend my money and live my life? I pay my taxes. I work. I raised three kids. Two are in college. My wife works. We enjoy visiting the CT casinos one or twice a month. Our neighbors to the same. We're college-educated. We're old enough and mature enough to know right from wrong. And we know that the chair of the Senate committee on economic development doesn't have a clue --- a clue --- as to the fiscal and economic issues at stake in this casino issue. Instead of calling for a new study, which is a political dodge on her part, she ought to be saying that the "jury is in." It's been in for years. Nearly 60% of MA residents want casinos in our state. Instead, Spilka reminds me of one of those moralistic, overly preachy politically correct types who want to impose their own personal morals on the rest of us. For God's sake, if you're not going to lead, get out of the way. People need jobs, Senator Spilka. The state and its cities and towns need a new and dependable tax revenue stream. Don't become one of those worthless lumps of coal like former House co-chair Dan Bosley.