Processing Your Payment

Please do not leave this page until complete. This can take a few moments.

January 10, 2020

Sudbury joins housing authority lawsuit

Brian Costello retired in July at the age of 63 from the Watertown Housing Authority. He had spent 36 years of his life working there, and had hoped to stay on a few more years as executive director.

Costello, however, was ineligible to receive even a cost-of-living adjustment under the Department of Housing and Community Development's guidelines for executive director pay. That meant that for every additional year that he worked, his pension benefit would decrease.

So, Costello left. And now he's one of two former directors, three current directors and seven local housing authorities suing the DHCD for what some are describing as an "overreaction" to an almost decade-old scandal at the Chelsea Housing Authority.

The local housing authorities and past and present officials from Fairhaven, Lawrence, Medford, Nantucket, Provincetown, Stoneham, Sudbury, and Watertown joined with the Massachusetts chapter of the National Association of Housing and Redevelopment Officials to file a lawsuit Thursday in Suffolk Superior Court.

The suit asks a judge to strike down DHCD's salary guidelines and enforcement practices as an excessive use of the power granted by the Legislature under a 2014 reform law to review and approve contracts for executive directors of local housing authorities. 

The challenge to DHCD's authority comes more than eight years after former Chelsea Housing Authority director Mike McLaughlin stained the profession of public housing administration by illegally concealing from the state an exorbitant $360,000 salary, which made him among the highest paid public housing officials in the country.

McLaughlin, who at the time was politically well connected on Beacon Hill, had only been reporting $160,000 in salary to the state. And after then-Gov. Deval Patrick demanded McLaughlin's resignation, McLaughlin tried to walk out of his job with $200,000 in payouts for unused vacation and other benefits.

The plaintiffs say the rebalancing of the scales after the McLaughlin scandal has tipped too far in the other direction, resulting in the "unlawful usurpation of local authority and control" that is hurting communities and people like Costello.

"It impacted me, but I don't want it to impact future executive directors," Costello told the News Service from a construction trailer in Cohasset, where he is now the clerk on a construction project for special needs housing. "This whole lawsuit is not about me or executive directors. It's about local control of housing authorities."

Costello's salary had been frozen for over two years at $115,902. Even while his employees received cost-of-living adjustments, Costello remained ineligible based on DHCD's enforcement of its salary guidelines, which are based on a housing authority's size.

So Costello retired earlier than he had planned, taking with him decades of experience. 

"Every community is different. Watertown is different from Waltham. Lawrence is different from Andover. Cohasset is different from Norwell. And what DHCD has tried to do is cookie cutter the thing without any deviation from their guidelines," he said.

After McLaughlin's behavior was disclosed, Gov. Patrick moved to cap executive director pay at $160,000 and filed legislation that would have regionalized the administration of public housing, which is currently handled by locally elected boards. The Legislature did not go along with Patrick's regionalization plan, but passed a reform law that gave DHCD the authority to review all executive director contracts.

The law also directed DHCD to issue contract guidelines, and extended the authority to "strike contract provisions that do not conform to the guidelines."

Michele Randazzo, the Boston attorney representing the housing authorities, says DHCD's interpretation of that statute has strayed too far from what she believes was the Legislature's intent. She points out in the complaint that the Legislature did not touch the section of state law that has long given local housing boards the authority to hire and establish the term of employment of their executive directors.

Randazzo and the housing directors said that they have been trying for several years to resolve their differences with DHCD informally, but have been unable to reach a compromise.

Sign up for Enews

WBJ Web Partners


Order a PDF